$LASR
nlight7/10Does he own it?
Early on he flagged it as merely interesting and in Feb explicitly said he held none. But in early March he stated first-person that he took positions at roughly a $3B market cap, and followed with hold-like-a-meme-stock language. No explicit portfolio percent was ever given, but the direct buy disclosure supports ownership.
His thesis
He frames it as the only US-listed pure-play on directed-energy/laser weapons, the laser-engine supplier behind Israel's Iron Beam, with huge TAM upside from missile/drone defense and the Golden Dome program. He loves the technology more than the fundamentals (he noted only low-20s percent revenue growth), treating it as a badass-tech moonshot validated by live combat footage and a strongly worded sell-side endorsement.
How his view evolved
Started as enthusiastic coverage of cool tech he didn't own (explicitly no position in February), then after live Iron Beam combat footage and conflict escalation he bought in at roughly a $3B cap in early March and shifted to a hold-it-long stance.
Key points
- Pitched as the sole US pure-play directed-energy/laser-weapons stock and Iron Beam supplier
- Explicitly held no position in February, then disclosed taking a position in early March
- Loves the tech but admits weak fundamentals; no portfolio weight ever stated
Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $LASR on X ↗