$META

Does he own it?

First tweet explicitly states he added a position around $625 with a detailed earnings-optics thesis, calls it a great long, and later lists getting Meta earnings right among his executed trades. These first-person buy/position statements clear the ownership bar, though it reads as a tactical trade rather than a sized core holding. No percent weight disclosed.

His thesis

Bullish on Meta as a mega-cap still growing 30%+ year-over-year at a modest forward multiple, with massive AI capex he argues is delivering real revenue and FCF rather than vanishing into a black hole. His original trade thesis was an earnings-optics play: a prior beat looked artificially weak due to tax accounting, which he expected to reverse and trigger algorithmic buying. He repeatedly frames selloffs (down to the $520s-$590s) as buying opportunities and treats Meta as a profitable hyperscaler funding the AI buildout he tracks upstream.

How his view evolved

Opened with a conviction add near $625 on an earnings-optics thesis, stayed loudly bullish through the report, then through spring used Meta mostly as a reference point for capex flows and as a buy-the-dip name during the macro/war selloff, claiming the recovery near $525 was generational.

Key points

• Explicitly added a position near $625 on an earnings-optics/algorithmic-reaction thesis
• Argues heavy AI capex is delivering ROI given 30%+ growth at a low forward P/E
• Repeatedly called selloffs into the $520s-$590s buying opportunities and a Meta as a hyperscaler funding his upstream semi/photonics plays

Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $META on X ↗