$NOK
nokia1/10Does he own it?
No first-person buying/holding/sizing language for NOK anywhere. Appears only inside supply-chain lists and as a customer/validator of his actual small-cap picks. In his June 9 list that includes NOK he explicitly discloses financial interest only in NBIS/TSEM/AAOI, deliberately excluding NOK. He frames NOK as a large "play it safe" name, not a holding.
His thesis
NOK is treated as one of the established large-cap incumbents in coherent DCI/DCO and silicon-photonics networking, and as a credibility-lending validator/qualifier of the small caps he actually owns (notably SIVE and XFAB, which he repeatedly cites NOK as evaluating or being a likely customer of). He views it positively as safe, broad AI/photonics exposure, but consistently steers toward smaller names for outsized returns rather than NOK itself.
How his view evolved
Static throughout. NOK recurs only as a list entry and as a supply-chain validator for his real picks. By the final tweet he explicitly excludes NOK from the names he holds, confirming it is coverage/context, not a position.
Key points
- Mentioned only within supply-chain/CPO landscape lists, never as a position
- Explicit disclosure naming his holdings excludes NOK
- Cited mainly as a customer/validator of his actual small-cap longs (SIVE, XFAB)
Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $NOK on X ↗