$PLTR
palantir3/10Does he own it?
No first-person buying/holding/sizing language anywhere. In his rating post he explicitly puts PLTR in the "Avoid" bucket on valuation/P/E. His detailed personal portfolio recap lists many longs (semis, memory, photonics, fintech) but PLTR only appears as a foil to Burry's poor returns, never as his own holding. No stated weight.
His thesis
He views PLTR as a legitimate AI/defense play with real warfighting/black-box capabilities and repeatedly defends it against Michael Burry's short thesis (mocking the HubSpot valuation comparison). At the same time he personally flags it as overvalued on a P/E basis and lists it under "Avoid." So he is narratively supportive of the company but unwilling to own it at current valuation, treating it mainly as a market/news barometer and a vehicle for ridiculing paid short-sellers.
How his view evolved
Starts by explicitly tagging PLTR "Avoid" on valuation. Later mentions become defenses against Burry's short and reactions to catalysts (Anduril contract, Trump posts, war correlation). Stance stays narratively pro-company but never converts to a personal long.
Key points
- Explicitly placed PLTR in his Avoid list over valuation/P/E
- Repeatedly defends PLTR's AI/defense relevance against Burry's short, but as commentary not a position
- Personal portfolio recaps never include PLTR as a holding; used only as a foil to Burry's returns
Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $PLTR on X ↗