$RGTI

Does he own it?

No first-person buy/hold/add/size statement for RGTI ever appears. It is used only as a list item, decliner, or valuation benchmark. When he took quantum exposure he went long a different name (INFQ), and he treats RGTI skeptically as speculative/overvalued. Latest mention explicitly says he holds no positions in the compared photonics name.

His thesis

RGTI is treated as a richly-valued, speculative quantum-computing name rather than a conviction holding. He flags it as a candidate for a reset or wipeout during liquidity-driven selloffs, cites it only as a market-cap and valuation reference point when discussing other quantum/photonics plays, and lists it among CHIPS Act funding recipients as research. His own quantum exposure went to a different, cheaper pure-play instead.

How his view evolved

Consistently a reference point, never a holding. Early mentions flag wipeout risk in selloffs; later mentions use it as a cautionary valuation yardstick for overvalued peers. Skeptical throughout.

Key points

• Used purely as a valuation/market-cap benchmark for other quantum and photonics names, never bought
• Flagged as speculative with reset/wipeout risk during margin-driven selloffs
• Took actual quantum exposure in a different name (INFQ), not RGTI

Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $RGTI on X ↗