$RTX

Does he own it?

Across all 8 tweets RTX appears only as a name-dropped defense prime in beneficiary baskets or as a customer/partner of the small caps he actually buys ($CPSH, $LASR, $SIVE). No first-person buy/hold/add/sizing language for RTX; he even frames the primes as the entities profiting at investors' expense, not as his holdings.

His thesis

RTX is cited as a generic large-cap defense beneficiary of Middle East conflict and as a downstream customer/partner that validates his preferred small-cap supply-chain plays (AlSiC, directed-energy lasers, photonics chips). He treats the big primes as context and as evidence the niche suppliers are real, not as an investable edge themselves. He is mildly positive on the defense theme broadly but voices skepticism that primes keep selling costly missiles to line their pockets.

How his view evolved

Static throughout. From January war-basket lists through spring photonics/defense threads, RTX stays a recurring background reference, never developing into a focused view or position.

Key points

• Listed only as a defense-prime beneficiary in conflict baskets
• Cited as a customer/partner validating his owned small caps (CPSH, LASR, SIVE)
• No first-person ownership, sizing, or position language for RTX

Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $RTX on X ↗