$VPG

Does he own it?

Strong first-person ownership evidence: opening tweet says he initiated/entered long positions; a Feb portfolio-weight breakdown lists VPG at 2.5% under small-cap moonshots; later he says he cut concentration on design-out risk and counts VPG among his realized 100%+ winners. Genuine holding, though small and later trimmed.

His thesis

VPG is an under-the-radar robotics supply-chain play, framed as his main robotics/humanoid exposure tied to Tesla Optimus. Thesis: VPG supplies sensors/foil tech for humanoids, capturing an estimated several-hundred-dollar value per robot (management quoted $500-$1,200), so at Tesla's millions-of-units production targets revenue could scale dramatically off a tiny market cap. High margins plus a clean balance sheet make it an asymmetric moonshot if robotics hits an inflection point.

How his view evolved

Began as high-conviction "top robotics pick" entry in January with aggressive scaling math. Through Feb earnings stayed bullish on humanoid order growth. By spring he trimmed concentration on Tesla design-out risk and weaker price action, treating it as a smaller long-term moonshot that nonetheless tripled before cooling off.

Key points

• Explicitly entered long; disclosed 2.5% portfolio weight as a small-cap moonshot
• Thesis hinges on Tesla Optimus per-robot value capture and operating leverage
• Cut concentration on design-out risk; stock tripled then faded, still counted a winner

Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $VPG on X ↗