$VRT
vertiv holdings5/10Does he own it?
No first-person long/add/size statement for VRT. The one indirect signal: in his YTD "AI Displacement" list he says he personally owns many of the names and lists exclusions (NVDA, BE) that do NOT include VRT, implying possible ownership. But it is never centered, sized, or affirmed; for the power/800V trade he names his actual position as NVTS, not VRT.
His thesis
VRT is treated as a beneficiary of the AI data-center buildout, specifically the power-delivery and thermal/cooling layer. He repeatedly slots it into basket-style maps of the AI supply chain alongside Eaton, Delta, Schneider, etc., framing hyperscaler capex growth and the shift to 800V DC power architecture as tailwinds. He sees it as a way to play accelerating compute/energy demand, though he is personally more enthusiastic about memory and photonics names.
How his view evolved
Consistently bullish throughout. Early mentions place VRT in broad AI-capex maps; later ones get more specific, tying it to the 800V DC power transition and noting it as a flagged beneficiary as that shift pulls ahead of schedule.
Key points
- Recurring pick in his AI data-center power/thermal beneficiary baskets
- Tied to the 800V DC architecture transition driven by Nvidia/Google
- Never sized or affirmed as a position; his named power-trade holding is NVTS, not VRT
Derived from a holistic read of his public posts — paraphrased, never quoted. See his actual posts about $VRT on X ↗